- NAP5
Link:www.nationalauditprojects.org.uk/NAP5home
- The latest published NAP study following on from NAP4
- Aimed to establish the incidence of accidental awareness under general anaesthetic (AAGA)
- All UK hospitals included, 1 year registry
- Included all cases of awareness where the patient expected to be unconscious
- What people reported
- Usually short period of awareness <5 mins
- 1/2 of cases caused distress, 1/2 more ‘neutral’ about experience.
- 41% went on to have longstanding psychological morbidity
- Early recognition and reassurance associated with better outcomes
- Risk factors for awareness
- Patient factors
- Female, young adults, obesity, previous AAGA, difficult airway
- Drug factors
- Thiopentone, TIVA, NMBDs used
- Subspecialty
- Obstetric, cardiothoracic, neurosurgical
- Organisational
- Junior anaesthetist, out of hours, emergencies
- Incidence of awareness
- The overall incidence of awareness was 1:19,000
- Much higher where NMBDs used (1:8,000) compared to when not used (1:136,000)
- NMBDs used in 46% of anaesthetics but 97% of reports were in such cases
- High risk specialties included cardiothoracics (1:8,600) & C-Section (1:670)
- C-Section accounted for 0.8% of GAs but 10% of cases of awareness
- Complaints occurred in 10-20% or cases, litigation in 5%.
- Some key recommendations
- A database of AAGA should be established
- The relevant authorities should work to seek solutions to problems associated with similar drug packaging
- Standards of TIVA ought to be set
- The use of PNS should be seen as standard
- Anaesthetists should be familiar with DOA monitors
- Patients with difficult airway should be considered high risk for AAGA
- Caution with RSI using thiopentone
- Patient transfer is a high risk period for AAGA
- It should be explained that sedation does not guarantee amnesia
- A structured pathway should exist for patients who have suffered AAGA
- Timing of awareness
- 1/2 of cases at induction
- Be wary of gaps in the delivery of anaesthetic agents. BEWARE THE GAP.
- Consider the need for further induction agent in difficult airway cases
- 1/3 of cases during maintenance
- Pain recall more of an issue in this group
- No obvious cause in 25% (?resistant to anaesthetic drugs)
- TIVA more commonly implicated (but often without using TCI models.
- 2/3 occurred at induction or emergence
- Residual paralysis a common theme
- Usually distressing
- Newer volatiles agents may have been switched off too early
- 20% of cases were related to sedation
- Poor communication with regards to what to expect is the main reason
- ITU
- Commonly due to low dose propofol infusions
- DOA monitors are rarely used
- Should be considered for TIVA plus NMBD anaesthesia as they were particularly high risk
- NAP5 App
Link:itunes.apple.com/gb/app/inap5/id989805582?ls=1&mt=8